These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Unexpected toxicity associated with use of body surface area for dosing melphalan in the dog. Author: Page RL, Macy DW, Thrall DE, Dewhirst MW, Allen SL, Heidner GL, Sim DA, McGee ML, Gillette EL. Journal: Cancer Res; 1988 Jan 15; 48(2):288-90. PubMed ID: 3335006. Abstract: A multiinstitutional Phase I study using i.v. melphalan was conducted in dogs with spontaneously occurring neoplasia. Melphalan was administered at 7.5, 10, 11.25, 12.5, and 20 mg/m2 of body surface area. Disproportionately greater toxicity was observed in small dogs. Seven of the eight dogs (88%) weighing less than 14 kg experienced severe myelosuppression (neutropenia, less than 1500/mm3; and/or thrombocytopenia, less than 80,000/mm3), whereas only three of 13 dogs (23%) weighing greater than 14 kg developed severe myelosuppression (P = 0.016). We concluded that small dogs are at greater risk of developing bone marrow toxicity from i.v. melphalan than large dogs if body surface area is used to calculate the dose. Although both body surface area and weight were found to be significantly correlated with severity of toxicity, melphalan-induced toxicity in dogs can be more accurately estimated by body weight than by surface area, P = 0.008 versus P = 0.022, respectively. It may be necessary to prescribe antineoplastic agents that are eliminated by processes not primarily under metabolic influence or that produce side effects on tissue not correlated to basal metabolic rate on a parameter other than body surface area. In dogs, melphalan should be dosed on a weight basis, and treatment groups should be stratified by weight in randomized clinical studies, particularly when the weight range of treated subjects is great.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]