These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3 tesla.
    Author: Xie S, Masokano IB, Liu W, Long X, Li G, Pei Y, Li W.
    Journal: Eur J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 135():109472. PubMed ID: 33370640.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) using different breathing schemes and readout-segmented EPI (RS-EPI) in the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, hepatic DWIs (b = 50, 300, 600 s/mm2) were performed in 22 volunteers on 3.0 T MRI using SS-EPI with free-breathing diffusion-weighted imaging (FB-DWI), breath-hold (BH-DWI), respiratory-triggered (RT-DWI) and navigator-triggered (NT-DWI), and readout-segmented EPI (RS-DWI). ADC and surrogate SNR (sSNR) were measured in nine anatomic locations in the right lobe, and image quality was assessed on all FB-DWI, BH-DWI, RT-DWI, NT-DWI, and RS-DWI sequences. The sequence with the optimal clinical utility was decided by systematically comparing the ADC repeatability, sSNR and image quality of the above DWIs. RESULTS: In all the five sequences, NT-DWI had the most reliable intra-observer agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.900-0.922; all P > 0.05), and a better interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.853-0.960; all p > 0.05) than RS-DWI (ICC:0.881-0.916; some P < 0.05). NT-DWI had the best ADC repeatability in the nine locations (mean ADC absolute differences: 38.47-56.38 × 10-6 mm2/s, limits of agreement (LOA): 17.33-22.52 × 10-6 mm2/s). Also, NT-DWI had the highest sSNR (Reader 1: 50.58 ± 20.11 (Superior), 74.06 ± 28.37 (Central), 80.99 ± 38.11(Inferior)); Reader 2: 48.07 ± 23.92 (Superior), 68.23 ± 32.91 (Central), 76.78 ± 33.07 (Inferior)) in three representative sections except for RS-DWI. Furthermore, NT-DWI had a better image quality than RS-DWI (P < 0.05) and was superior to FB-DWI and BH-DWI in sharpness of the liver (at b = 300 s/mm2) (P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: RS-DWI has the best SNR. However, NT-DWI can provide sufficient SNR, excellent image quality, and the best ADC repeatability on 3.0 T MRI. It is thus the recommended sequence for the clinical application of hepatic DWI.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]