These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Characteristics and Sources of PM2.5 Pollution in Typical Cities of the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration in Autumn and Winter]. Author: Miao QQ, Jiang N, Zhang RQ, Zhao XN, Qi JW. Journal: Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2021 Jan 08; 42(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 33372453. Abstract: To study the characteristics of PM2.5 pollution and the potential sources of its main components in the central plain urban agglomeration in autumn and winter, PM2.5 samples were collected continually in the four typical cities of Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Anyang, and Xinxiang from October 2018 to January 2019. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, carbon analysis methods, and ion chromatography were used to determine 18 kinds of inorganic elements, organic carbon (OC)/elemental carbon (EC), and 9 kinds of water-soluble inorganic ions. According to the daily PM2.5 concentration, three pollution levels were divided, and the comparative analysis for the spatial and temporal variation of PM2.5 and its main components, i.e., NO3-, OC, and 18 kinds of inorganic elements, were studied via the calculation of the nitrogen oxidation rate (NOR), secondary organic carbon (SOC), and enrichment factor. The emission sources and their contribution rates of PM2.5 pollution level in the four cities were calculated by a chemical mass balance (CMB) model; the potential pollution sources of PM2.5 and its main components, NO3- and OC, in the four cities were analyzed by a backward trajectory model (HYSPLIT) and potential source contribution factor method (PSCF). The results showed that the means of PM2.5 in Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Anyang, and Xinxiang were (82.1±45.5), (84.7±39.8), (96.8±46.1), and (81.1±36.6) μg·m-3, respectively, during the sampling period, and the maximum daily mean values were 3.3, 2.6, 3.0, and 2.3 times, respectively, of the Chinese national secondary standard; the main components of PM2.5 in the four cities were NO3- and SOC, and the concentration of NO3-, the ratio of NO3-/EC, and NOR all increased significantly with the rising of pollution levels, generally showing that the mean values of NO3-/EC and NOR of Zhengzhou and Luoyang were a little higher than those of Anyang and Xinxiang; the concentration of SOC, the proportion of SOC in OC, and the ratio of SOC/EC all increased with the rising of pollution levels. From the concentration and enrichment degree of inorganic elements, As was the highest in Zhengzhou; Mn and Fe were the highest in Luoyang; Zn, Ni, and Cr were the highest in Anyang; and Cu and Pb were the highest in Xinxiang. Secondary nitrate, secondary sulfate, organic matter, coal combustion, motor vehicle, dust, biomass burning, and industrial processes were the main PM2.5 pollution sources in the four cities, with the highest contribution rate of secondary nitrate in Zhengzhou (37.7%), the highest contribution rate of vehicle sources in Xinxiang (14.1%), and a relatively high contribution rate of industrial process source in Luoyang (7.0%) and Anyang (6.8%). The northwest direction of airflow contributed 51.6%, 49.2%, 49.6%, and 46.3% of the total airflow in Zhengzhou, Luoyang, Anyang, and Xinxiang, respectively. From the potential pollution area of each city, the Zhengzhou area was mainly concentrated in Henan province, the Luoyang area was mainly concentrated in the south of Henan province and Fen-wei plain, and the Anyang and Xinxiang areas were mainly concentrated in Henan province and the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei transport belt. The pollution levels of OC in Anyang and Xinxiang were also affected by the northwest Anhui, southwest Shandong, southeast Shanxi, and north Shaanxi.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]