These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of Blood Pressure Visit-to-Visit Variability on Adverse Events in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry.
    Author: Kodani E, Inoue H, Atarashi H, Okumura K, Yamashita T, Otsuka T, Origasa H, J‐RHYTHM Registry Investigators *.
    Journal: J Am Heart Assoc; 2021 Jan 05; 10(1):e018585. PubMed ID: 33372541.
    Abstract:
    Background Blood pressure (BP) variability has reportedly been a risk factor for various clinical events. To clarify the influence of BP visit-to-visit variability on adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, a post hoc analysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry was performed. Methods and Results Of 7406 outpatients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from 158 institutions, 7226 (age, 69.7±9.9 years; men, 70.7%), in whom BP was measured 4 times or more (14.6±5.0 times) during the 2-year follow-up period or until occurrence of an event, constituted the study group. SD and coefficient of variation of BP values were calculated as BP variability. Thromboembolism, major hemorrhage, and all-cause death occurred in 110 (1.5%), 121 (1.7%), and 168 (2.3%) patients, respectively. When patients were divided into quartiles of systolic BP-SD (<8.20, 8.20-10.49, 10.50-13.19, and ≥13.20 mm Hg), hazard ratios (HRs) for all adverse events were significantly high in the highest quartile compared with the lowest quartile (HR, 2.00, 95% CI, 1.15-3.49, P=0.015 for thromboembolism; HR, 2.60, 95% CI, 1.36-4.97, P=0.004 for major hemorrhage; and HR, 1.85, 95% CI, 1.11-3.07, P=0.018 for all-cause death) after adjusting for components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, warfarin and antiplatelet use, atrial fibrillation type, BP measurement times, and others. These findings were consistent when BP-coefficient of variation was used instead of BP-SD. Conclusions Systolic BP visit-to-visit variability was significantly associated with all adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Further studies are needed to clarify the causality between BP variability and adverse outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000001569.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]