These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gastric Inverted Polyps-Distinctive Subepithelial Lesions of the Stomach: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 12 Cases With an Emphasis on Neoplastic Potential.
    Author: Kim JY, Ahn S, Kim KM, Chang SH, Kim HS, Lee JH, Kim JJ, Sohn TS, Kang HJ, Joo M.
    Journal: Am J Surg Pathol; 2021 May 01; 45(5):680-689. PubMed ID: 33399336.
    Abstract:
    Gastric inverted polyps (GIPs) are rare gastric polyps characterized by a submucosal inverted growth of mucosal components. Because of their rarity, they are not well characterized and are diagnostically challenging. We examined 12 cases of GIPs arising in 8 male and 4 female patients (mean age: 56 y). Most GIPs (11/12, 92%) occurred as a single, rounded subepithelial lesion in the body or fundus (mean size: 14.9 mm). Histologically, GIPs consisted of gastric-type glandular epithelium and smooth muscle component, growing in an endophytic manner; however, they displayed significant morphologic variations. We classified GIPs into 3 subtypes by the following features: communication with the mucosal surface, smooth muscle boundary, and tissue organization. The defining characteristics of type 1 were a mucosal communicating structure at the center and a well-defined smooth muscle boundary, resulting in a characteristic low-magnification morphology of a round vase. Type 2 had an organized glandular proliferation with smooth muscle boundary and no central communicating structure. Type 3 GIPs had no mucosal communicating structure or smooth muscle boundary; its key histologic feature was the lobular organization pattern produced by proliferations of cystic or hyperplastic glands and smooth muscle. All type 1 GIPs exhibited coexisting adenocarcinoma (3 cases) or stromal proliferation (3 cases). Three patients with type 2 GIP had separate adenocarcinoma. None of the type 3 GIPs had accompanying carcinoma. In conclusion, GIPs are a heterogenous group showing different morphology and clinical behavior. Notably, type 1 GIP could be considered a precancerous lesion with the potential to develop adenocarcinoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]