These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Gliomatosis Cerebri Growth Pattern: Association of Differential First-Line Treatment with Overall Survival in WHO Grade II and III Gliomas.
    Author: Divé I, Steidl E, Wagner M, Filipski K, Burger MC, Franz K, Harter PN, Bähr O, Fokas E, Herrlinger U, Steinbach JP.
    Journal: Oncology; 2021; 99(4):215-224. PubMed ID: 33472203.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is defined by diffuse, widespread glial tumor growth affecting three or more cerebral lobes. Previous studies in gliomas found no distinct histological or molecular GC subtype, yet the presence of GC is associated with worse median overall survival (OS). Here, we explored whether differing therapeutic strategies in first-line treatment could account for this. METHODS: From our University Cancer Center database, 47 patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III glioma and GC imaging pattern were identified. GC criteria were confirmed by independent review. Patients with WHO grade II or III glioma with non-GC pattern served as control cohort (n = 343). RESULTS: Within the GC patient cohort, lower WHO grade, mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) status, and absence of contrast enhancement were associated with better OS. Compared to the control cohort, patients with GC had significantly shorter OS independent of histological diagnosis or IDH1 mutation status. Patients with GC preferentially received chemotherapy alone (62 vs. 18%), and less frequently radiochemotherapy (21 vs. 27%). OS was significantly shorter in the GC cohort compared to the non-GC cohort both for chemotherapy (3.9 vs. 7.6 years, p = 0.0085) and for combined radiochemotherapy (1.1 vs. 8.4 years, p < 0.0001). However, when only patients who received biopsy plus chemotherapy were analyzed, the differences lost statistical significance (3.5 vs. 6.6 years, p = 0.196). CONCLUSION: We found major differences in the selection of first-line therapies of GC versus non-GC patients. Our results suggest that these differences may partly account for the worse prognosis of GC patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]