These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A multidisciplinary approach to management of abdominal lymphatic malformations.
    Author: Zamora AK, Barry WE, Nowicki D, Ourshalimian S, Navid F, Miller JM, Zeinati C, Anselmo DM.
    Journal: J Pediatr Surg; 2021 Aug; 56(8):1425-1429. PubMed ID: 33526253.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Abdominal lymphatic malformations (LM) are a rare subset of vascular anomaly caused by abnormal development of the lymphatic system. They are classified as macrocystic, microcystic or combination macrocystic and microcystic. Surgical resection, percutaneous sclerotherapy, and medical therapy are all employed to treat these complex and often symptomatic lesions. No standardized treatment algorithm exists currently. The purpose of this study was to establish a multidisciplinary treatment approach to abdominal LMs. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2013 to 2019 on patients with abdominal LMs at a single tertiary children's hospital vascular anomalies center. Demographics, imaging, and treatment modality were recorded. Clinical and/or radiographic response to the primary treatment modality as well as complications was the outcomes measured. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (12 macrocystic, 5 microcystic and 2 combined) were identified, with a median age at diagnosis of 2.2 years (range 0.1-20.8 years). Sclerotherapy was the most common primary treatment, followed by surgical resection and sirolimus. No difference in clinical response (p = 0.58) or complications (p = 0.31) was observed based on primary treatment or subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our institutional experience, we propose an LM subtype-based treatment algorithm for abdominal LMs. It employs a multidisciplinary approach, and results in satisfactory patient outcomes with minimal complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]