These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Differentiating Glioblastoma from Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: The Value of Shaping and Nonenhancing Peritumoral Hyperintense Gyral Lesion on FLAIR Imaging. Author: Wang P, Shi YH, Li JY, Zhang CZ. Journal: World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():e696-e704. PubMed ID: 33548537. Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study describes a distinct magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) feature, placing emphasis on fluid-attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1C) images for the preoperative differentiation of glioblastoma (GBM) from primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). METHODS: The preoperative MRI findings of 116 pathologically confirmed glioblastoma (n = 72) and PCNSL (n = 44) were retrospectively reviewed. Two neuroimaging specialists analyzed the MRIs, and image analysis was focused on the presence or absence of a shaping and nonenhancing peritumoral hyperintense gyral lesion on FLAIR imaging (SNEPGF, i.e., hyperintense lesion in a shaping and nonenhancing peritumoral gyral area on FLAIR imaging). The gyral area adjacent to and within 3 cm of the enhanced tumor was defined as the peritumoral gyrus region. The FLAIR hyperintensity lesion were termed as the signal intensity ratio ≥30% compared with contralateral normal gray matter. Then, the differential diagnostic efficacy of SNEFPG sign for GBM and PCNSL was analyzed. RESULTS: The SNEPGF sign was found in 33 GBM cases (33 of 72, 45.8%), and the FLAIR signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient value of these area were lower than the peritumoral edema area (P < 0.0001). In 44 PCNSL cases, no SNEPGF sign was found. A slightly higher FLAIR signal intensity was seen in 9 PCNSLs, but uniform and marked enhancement was seen in these areas. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the differential diagnosis of GBM and PCNSL with SNEPGF sign were 45.8%, 100%, 100%, and 53.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SNEPGF sign is effective in identifying GBM from PCNSL, especially with high specificity.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]