These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Measurement of pulmonary mechanics in the newborn lamb: a comparison of three techniques.
    Author: Davis GM, Coates AL, Dalle D, Bureau MA.
    Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 1988 Mar; 64(3):972-81. PubMed ID: 3366752.
    Abstract:
    Although recent interest in neonatal respiratory mechanics has led to the development of a plethora of techniques for measuring lung compliance and resistance, a critical appraisal of the limitations of these techniques in the newborn has not been performed to date. We evaluated three techniques of measuring respiratory mechanics in the newborn lamb, with the reference method (method 1) being the Mead-Whittenberger technique using flow, volume, and esophageal pressure (Pes) by water-filled catheter, and the other two methods entailing the measurement of mouth pressure (Pm) during airway occlusion (method 2 using end-expiratory occlusion; method 3 using end-inspiratory occlusion). Each technique was evaluated during eupnea and tachypnea in intubated and nonintubated newborn lambs. We found that the use of Pes for the measurement of resistance and compliance gave the most reliable results during both eupnea and tachypnea in both the intubated and nonintubated subjects. The airway occlusion techniques that use Pm to derive resistance and compliance (methods 2 and 3) gave more variable results under all conditions of testing. Method 2 was the least precise method of measurement with a variability of greater than 30% compared with a variation of less than 20% for method 1. For all three methods, it was found that the number of breaths needed for reproducible measurements of mechanics was four to six during eupnea and seven to nine during tachypnea.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]