These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Magnetic resonance imaging versus angiography in the preoperative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Author: Ruff SJ, Watson MR.
    Journal: Am J Surg; 1988 May; 155(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 3369619.
    Abstract:
    Magnetic resonance is a cost-effective imaging tool in the preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm, and yields more clinically relevant information than ultrasonography and computerized tomography. Magnetic resonance imaging has advantages over angiography in that is costs substantially less, is noninvasive, and reconstructs images in multiple planes. By utilizing multiplanar imaging, magnetic resonance imaging yields more information than angiography. The position of the left renal vein is imaged only by magnetic resonance, as is the origin of the superior mesenteric artery. Angiography remains important in patients with associated occlusive disease and claudication. The use of magnetic resonance in the emergent setting is limited at this time.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]