These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Author: Chill HH, Navon I, Reuveni-Salzman A, Cohen A, Dick A, Shveiky D.
    Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835.
    Abstract:
    STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and anatomic outcomes as well as patient satisfaction in women undergoing vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system (Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA) and transvaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (VUSLS) for the treatment of apical prolapse. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery unit at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Women with apical prolapse who underwent either vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system (uterine-preserving as well as after previous hysterectomy) or VUSLS from 2010 to 2019. Excluded were women with 1 month or less of follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 164 women were included in the study: 112 women underwent VUSLS, and 52 underwent colposuspension using the Uphold Lite mesh system. Age, body mass index, maximal birth weight, comorbidity rates, and pelvic organ prolapse severity were similar between the groups. The clinical cure rate was similarly high in both groups, with 91.1% in the women who underwent VUSLS and 88.5% in those in the Uphold Lite group (p = .60). No differences were noted between the groups with regard to anatomic cure rate or composite outcome success rate (73.9% vs 76.0%, p = .77 and 70.3% vs 74.0%, p = .63, in the VUSLS and Uphold Lite groups, respectively). An advantage was noted in the VUSLS group with regard to patient satisfaction with 98.1% of the women stating that their condition was very much better (Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire: A) or much better (Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire: B) compared with 83.9% of the women in the Uphold Lite group (p = .023). In an attempt to assess the association between different variables and the composite outcome, a multivariate analysis was performed in which increased body mass index, menopausal status, and increased preoperative genital hiatus were found to decrease composite outcome success. CONCLUSION: Vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite system and VUSLS for the treatment of apical prolapse have comparable results with high clinical success rates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]