These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effect of sealing strategy on the feeding value of corn silage for growing dairy heifers.
    Author: Parra CS, Bragatto JM, Piran Filho FA, Silva SMS, Tuzzi BF, Jobim CC, Daniel JLP.
    Journal: J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6792-6802. PubMed ID: 33741155.
    Abstract:
    Our objective was to compare the performance of dairy heifers fed diets based on whole-plant corn silage stored in bunker silos sealed with either standard polyethylene film (white-on-black, actual thickness 121 ± 3.1 µm) covering the top surface, held in place with rows of tires every 3 m (PE) or an oxygen barrier system comprised of an ethylene-vinyl alcohol film (actual thickness 46.7 ± 2.5 µm) lining side walls and covering the silage, protected with a woven anti-UV cover and gravel bags placed around the edges and every 3 m across the silo (OB). Whole-plant corn was mechanically harvested at 39% dry matter (DM), packed in bunker silos, and sealed with PE or OB covering methods. After 6 mo of storage, silos were opened and fed to 26 Holstein heifers (260 ± 89.1 kg of shrunk body weight) for 60 d. Heifers were blocked by initial weight (13 blocks with 2 heifers each block) and housed in individual pens. Diets contained (on a DM basis) 80% corn silage (PE or OB), 17.5% soybean meal, and 2.5% mineral mix. Dry matter intake was measured daily, whereas shrunk body weight, hip height, heart girth, and body condition score were measured at the beginning and end of the experiment. Feeding behavior was recorded on d 24 and 46, and total-tract digestibility was measured from d 26 to 30 and 48 to 52. Data of intake, feeding behavior, and digestibility were averaged by animal for the whole feeding period before the statistical analysis. Data of animal performance were analyzed as a randomized complete block design. Initial shrunk body weight was used as a covariate for analyses of intake and body measures. During feed-out, silage quality was also assessed at the top (15 cm depth from upper surface) and bottom layer (135 cm depth from upper surface) and analyzed as a split-plot design. Silage stored under the OB sealing system had less yeast, mold, and NH3-N, and more lactic acid and ethanol-soluble carbohydrates. An interaction between sealing strategy and silo layer showed that OB silage had lower values of temperature, pH, anaerobic spores, acetic acid, and DM loss, and greater in vitro DM digestibility and aerobic stability, especially in the top layer. The proportion of inedible silage was lower in OB than in PE treatment (0.82 vs. 4.00% DM). Total-tract digestibility was similar between treatments, but animals that received the OB diet had higher DM intake by approximately 9% (9.39 vs. 10.20 kg/d) due to a faster eating rate and a greater number of meals per day. Therefore, OB treatment increased the digestible energy intake by 8% (26.3 vs. 28.3 Mcal/d) and average daily gain by 12% (1.08 vs. 1.21 kg/d). Body condition score change was similar between treatments, but heifers fed OB had greater heart girth and tended to have higher hip height. In conclusion, replacing a standard PE film with an OB sealing system improved silage conservation and performance of growing dairy heifers.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]