These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Dual-tracer approach vs. dual time-point approach in leukocyte scintigraphy in treatment evaluation of persistent chronic prosthetic joint infection.
    Author: Teiler J, Åkerlund B, Brismar H, Savitcheva I, Ahl M, Bjäreback A, Hedlund H, Holstensson M, Axelsson R.
    Journal: Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Jul 01; 42(7):719-724. PubMed ID: 33741868.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Both dual time-point 99mTc-hexamethylpropylene amine oxime (HMPAO)-leukocyte scintigraphy and dual-tracer 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy (with the addition of 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy) have been used to diagnose prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A treatment evaluation of persistent PJI using these imaging protocols has yet to be presented. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of dual time-point 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy to the dual-tracer alternative of single time-point 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy or single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) combined with a 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy or SPECT/CT, for treatment evaluation of PJI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one PJI patients under antibiotic treatment were included in this retrospective study. Examinations were organized into three settings. Setting one used dual time-point approach with delayed (2 h) and late (24 h) planar 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy, including both visual and semiquantitative analysis. Setting two used delayed (2 h) planar 99mTc-HMPAO-leukocyte scintigraphy combined with 99mTc-nanocolloid bone marrow scintigraphy and for setting three SPECT/CT replaced planar imaging. RESULTS: Accuracy was 0.68 for visual evaluation and 0.55 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.71 for setting two; and 0.68 for setting three. Sensitivity was 0.54 for visual evaluation and 0.31 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.38 for setting two; and 0.46 for setting three. Specificity was 0.78 for visual evaluation and 0.72 for semiquantitative evaluation of setting one; 0.94 for setting two; and 0.83 for setting three. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity between the approaches for treatment evaluation of suspected persistent PJI in the hip or knee was observed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]