These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Posterior vault distraction osteogenesis: indications and expectations.
    Author: Carlson AR, Taylor JA.
    Journal: Childs Nerv Syst; 2021 Oct; 37(10):3119-3125. PubMed ID: 33743044.
    Abstract:
    Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) in patients with craniosynostosis serves to correct abnormal skull morphology and increase intracranial volume to prevent or treat pathologic increases in intracranial pressure (Taylor and Bartlett, Plast Reconstr Surg 140: 82e-93e, 2017). Distraction osteogenesis is a well-established technique for bony repositioning and growth stimulation in the facial and long bones, in which the gradual separation of bony segments at an osteotomy site results in generation of new bone and subsequent bone lengthening (Greene, 2018). While initially described in the orthopedic literature, the relevance and applicability of distraction osteogenesis to craniofacial surgery has been well-studied and is now well-established (Steinbacher et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 127: 792-801, 2011). Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) was introduced as a treatment option for cranial vault expansion in patients with craniosynostosis in 2009 by White et al., based upon the premise that posterior vault distraction could provide greater intracranial volume expansion than fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling (FOAR), but that acute posterior cranial vault expansions were limited by the soft tissue envelope of the infant scalp and prone to relapse related to the supine positioning typical of infants (White et al., Childs Nerv Syst 25: 231-236, 2009). Since this introduction, significant evidence has accrued regarding the safety of, and outcomes after, PVDO. PVDO is now known to provide larger increases in intracranial volume in comparison to anterior cranial vault remodeling procedures (Derderian et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1665-1672, 2015) and to provide morphologic improvements in both the posterior and anterior cranial vaults (Goldstein et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1367-1375, 2013). Perioperative major morbidity is comparable to conventional vault remodeling (Taylor et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 129:674e-680e, 2012) and the procedure has been safely applied to patients of various ages with syndromic and non-syndromic craniosynostosis (Zhang et al., J Craniofac Surg 29:566-571, 2018; Li et al., J Craniofac Surg 27:1165-1169, 2016). Many high-volume craniofacial centers now consider PVDO the preferred first operation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis, and indications for this procedure continue to expand as evidence accrues regarding its utility and safety (Steinbacher et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 127: 792-801, 2011; Swanson et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 137:829e-841e, 2016).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]