These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: CMR feature tracking strain patterns and their association with circulating cardiac biomarkers in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Author: Cavus E, Muellerleile K, Schellert S, Schneider J, Tahir E, Chevalier C, Jahnke C, Radunski UK, Adam G, Kirchhof P, Blankenberg S, Lund GK, Avanesov M, Patten M.
    Journal: Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Nov; 110(11):1757-1769. PubMed ID: 33779809.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: CMR feature tracking strain (CMR-FT) provides prognostic information. However, there is a paucity of data in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We sought to analyze global CMR-FT parameters in all four cardiac chambers and to assess associations with NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) in patients with HCM. METHODS: This retrospective study included 144 HCM patients and 16 healthy controls with CMR at 1.5 T. Analyses were performed on standard steady-state free precession cine (SSFP) CMR data using a commercially available software. Global left ventricular (LV) strain was assessed as longitudinal (LVLAX-GLS), circumferential (LVLAX-GCS) and radial strain (LVLAX-GRS) on long -axis (LAX) and as LVSAX-GCS and LVSAX-GRS on short- axis (SAX). Right ventricular (RV-GLS), left atrial (LA-GLS) and right atrial (RA-GLS) strain were assessed on LAX. RESULTS: We found LVLAX-GLS [- 18.9 (- 22.0, - 16.0), - 23.5 (- 25.5, - 22.0) %, p = 0.0001), LVSAX-GRS [86.8 (65.9-115.5), 119.6 (91.3-143.7) %, p = 0.001] and LALAX-GLS [LA2CH-GLS 29.2 (19.1-37.7), LA2CH-GLS 38.2 (34.3-47.1) %, p = 0.0036; LA4CH-GLS 22.4 (14.6-30.7) vs. LA4CH-GLS 33.4 (28.4-37.3) %, p = 0.0033] to be impaired in HCM compared to healthy controls despite normal LVEF. Furthermore, LV and LA strain parameters were impaired in HCM with elevated NT-proBNP and/or hsTnT, despite preserved LVEF compared to HCM with normal biomarker levels. There was a moderate correlation of LV and LA CMR-FT with levels of NT-proBNP and hsTnT. CONCLUSION: CMR-FT reveals LV and LA dysfunction in HCM despite normal LVEF. The association between impaired LV strain and elevated NT-proBNP and hsTnT indicates a link between unapparent functional abnormalities and disease severity in HCM. Typical CMR-FT findings in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]