These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differences Between CT-Perfusion and Biphasic Contrast-enhanced CT for Detection and Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Potential Explanations for Discrepant Cases.
    Author: Perl RM, Portugall J, Hinterleitner C, Hinterleitner M, Kloth C, Walter SS, Bitzer M, Horger MS.
    Journal: Anticancer Res; 2021 Mar; 41(3):1451-1458. PubMed ID: 33788737.
    Abstract:
    AIM: To compare the diagnostic value of liver perfusion computed tomography (PCT) and biphasic contrast-enhanced CT (bpCECT) for detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to identify potential causes for inter-modal discrepancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 162 cases with a total of 325 HCC-typical lesions were evaluated using both PCT and bpCECT (mean time between examinations=15 days, range=0-13 days). HCC diagnosis was performed by multi-modality imaging including lesion growth at follow-up. For PCT, a total acquisition time of 40 s (26 measurements) each 1.5 s using 80 kV and 100 mAs, as well as 50 ml iodine contrast agent (at 5 ml/s) covering the entire liver was used. Mean arterial liver perfusion (ALP), portal venous perfusion (PVP) and hepatic arterial index (HPI) for both tumor and non-involved liver parenchyma; mean blood flow, blood volume and k-trans for tumor were quantified. Tumor localization, and size were registered. bpCECT consisted of unenhanced, arterial (30-33 s delay), and portal-venous (70-75 s) phases performed using 120 kV, 200-250 mAs, thin-slice reformates (<1 mm), 100 ml contrast agent (at 3 ml/s) followed by 50 ml saline flush. Finally, we divided the results according to detection by PCT only (i.e. missed by pbCECT), and by both PCT and pbCECT. RESULTS: PCT detected 272 lesions compared to 217 with bpCECT only. HCCs in liver segments 4 and 5 were significantly better detected by PCT (p<0.005). Furthermore, PCT detected significantly smaller HCCs than did bpCECT (p<0.001). Lesions detected by both methods had significantly higher mean ALP (p=0.03) and HPI (p=0.02), and lower mean PVP (p=0.01). Tumor blood flow, blood volume and k-trans proved not to be significant for lesion detection. The mean ALP, HPI, and PVP in inconspicuous cirrhotic liver were also not significant for lesion detection. The PVP(tumor)/HPI(liver) ratio of detected lesions was significantly higher for PCT alone (p=0.04). Pretreated, still vital lesions were better detected by bpCECT. CONCLUSION: Detection of smaller HCC lesions, lesions located in liver segments 4 and 5, as well as lesions presenting lower ALP and HPI, and higher PVP(tumor)/HPI(liver) ratio was better using both methods, emphasizing the important role of PCT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]