These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Layer-specific strain and dyssynchrony index alteration in new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients without cardiac symptoms.
    Author: Luo T, Wang Z, Chen Z, Yu E, Fang C.
    Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2021 Apr; 11(4):1271-1283. PubMed ID: 33816166.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Layer-specific speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) is a noninvasive approach that assesses subclinical left ventricular dysfunction. We aimed to investigate the (I) alteration of layer-specific STE parameters and the dyssynchrony index; and (II) the disease parameters associated with layer-specific STE change in drug-naïve patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) without cardiac symptoms. METHODS: Thirty-five drug-naïve patients with new-onset SLE and twenty-five healthy controls were enrolled. All individuals received both conventional echocardiographic and two-dimensional STE assessment. The data of layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and peak systolic dispersion (PSD) were acquired in layer-specific STE. RESULTS: All patients had a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)(mean LVEF: 58%) and conventional echocardiographic parameters were comparable between patients and controls. Decreased layer-specific GLS and elevated PSD were observed in SLE patients (whole layer GLS: -17.6%±3.0% versus -19.3%±2.6%, P=0.02; endocardial GLS: -20.0%±3.2% versus -22.1%±3.0%, P=0.01; epicardial GLS: -15.6%±2.7% versus -16.8%±2.4%, P=0.04; PSD: 41.0±18.9 versus 28.8±10.1 msec, P=0.007). In contrast, there was no difference in layer-specific GCS at three different levels between patients and controls (P>0.05). More severely impaired GLS was observed in patients with higher disease activity, high-risk antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, or renal involvement. The PSD was increased in patients with higher disease activity or a high-risk aPL profile. Correlational analysis showed that GLS at three layers and PSD correlated with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels (whole GLS: r=0.662, P<0.001; endocardial GLS: r=0.637, P<0.001; epicardial GLS: r=0.658, P<0.001; PSD: r=0.390, P=0.021). PSD correlated with epicardial GLS (r=0.360, P=0.047), when treating the hsCRP level, renal involvement, aPL profile, and disease activity as control variables. Multivariate regression showed the hsCRP level and epicardial GLS were predictors of layer-specific GLS impairment and elevated PSD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Drug-naive patients with new-onset SLE are likely to have subclinical GLS impairment and left ventricular dyssynchrony, even in the presence of normal LVEF. SLE-related risk factors are associated with these dysfunctions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]