These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Automated detection of hippocampal sclerosis: Comparison of a composite MRI-based index with conventional MRI measures.
    Author: Zhao L, Zhang X, Luo Y, Hu J, Liang C, Wang L, Gao J, Qi X, Zhai F, Shi L, Zhu M.
    Journal: Epilepsy Res; 2021 Aug; 174():106638. PubMed ID: 33964793.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the performance of an MRI-based composite index (HSI) with conventional MRI-based measures in hippocampal sclerosis (HS) detection and postoperative outcome estimation. METHODS: Seventy-two temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with pathologically confirmed HS and fifteen TLE patients without HS were included retrospectively. The T1-weighted and FLAIR images of these patients were processed with AccuBrain to quantify the hippocampal volume (HV) and the hippocampal FLAIR signal. The HSI index that considered both HV and hippocampal FLAIR signal was also calculated. Two experienced neuropathologists rated the HS severity with the resected tissue and reached an agreement for all cases. The asymmetry indices of the MRI measures were used to lateralize the sclerotic side, and the original MRI measures were applied to detect HS vs. normal hippocampi. Operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed for these predictions. We also investigated the sensitivity of the ipsilateral MRI measures in characterizing the pathological severity of HS and the associations of the MRI measures with postoperative outcomes (Engel class categories). RESULTS: With the optimal cutoffs, the asymmetry indices of HSI and HV both achieved excellent performance in differentiating left vs. right HS (accuracy = 100 %), and the absolute value of the asymmetry index of HSI performed best in differentiating unilateral vs. bilateral HS (accuracy = 91.7 %). Regarding the detection of HS, HSI performed better in sensitivity (94.4 % vs. 87.5 %) while HV performed better in specificity (93.6 % vs. 89.4 %) when the contralateral site of unilateral HS and both sides of non-HS patients were considered as the normal reference, and HSI performed even better than HV when only both sides of non-HS patients were considered as the normal reference (AUC: 0.956 vs. 0.934, p = 0.038). The ipsilateral HSI presented the strongest association with the pathological rating of HS severity (r = 0.405, p < 0.001). None of the ipsilateral or contralateral MRI measures was associated with the postoperative outcomes. Among the asymmetry indices, only the absolute value of the asymmetry index of HV presented a significant association with the Engel classifications for the Year 2∼3 visit (r = -0.466, p = 0.004) or the latest visit with >1 year follow-up (r = -0.374, p = 0.003) while controlling for disease duration and follow-up duration. CONCLUSION: The HSI index and HV presented comparable good performance in HS detection, and HSI may have better sensitivity than HV in differentiating pathological HS severity. Higher magnitude of HV dissymmetry may indicate better post-surgical outcomes for HS patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]