These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Left behind again: Rural home health services in a Medicaid pediatric accountable care organization.
    Author: Hardy RY, Liu GC, Conkol KJ, Gleeson SP, Kelleher KJ.
    Journal: J Rural Health; 2022 Mar; 38(2):420-426. PubMed ID: 33978993.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To contrast trends in rural and urban pediatric home health care use among Medicaid enrollees. METHODS: Medicaid administrative claims data were used to assess differences in home health care use for child members in a large pediatric accountable care organization (ACO) in Ohio. Descriptive statistics assessed rural and urban differences in health care use over a 10-year period between 2010 and 2019. FINDINGS: Pediatric home health care use increased markedly in the low-income (CFC) and disabled (ABD) Medicaid categories. Over the past 10 years, CFC-enrolled children from urban communities have seen more home health visits, fewer emergency department (ED) visits, and more well child visits compared to rural CFC-enrolled children. Children enrolled due to disabilities in urban communities have also seen more home health visit use but fewer preventive care visits than their rural counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Within a pediatric ACO, rural home health care use has remained relatively stagnant over a 10-year period, a stark contrast to increases in home health care use among comparable urban populations. There are likely multiple explanations for these differences, including overuse in urban communities, lack of access in rural communities, and changes to home health reimbursement. More can be done to improve rural home health access. Such improvement will likely necessitate large-scale changes to home health care delivery, workforce, and financing. Improvements should be evaluated for return-on-investment not only in terms of direct costs, that is, reduced inpatient or ED costs, but also in terms of patient and family quality-of-life or key indicators of child well-being such as educational attainment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]