These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Automated Segmental Analysis of Fully Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Maps by First-Pass Perfusion Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
    Author: Jacobs M, Benovoy M, Chang LC, Corcoran D, Berry C, Arai AE, Hsu LY.
    Journal: IEEE Access; 2021; 9():52796-52811. PubMed ID: 33996344.
    Abstract:
    First pass gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging allows fully quantitative pixel-wise myocardial blood flow (MBF) assessment, with proven diagnostic value for coronary artery disease. Segmental analysis requires manual segmentation of the myocardium. This work presents a fully automatic method of segmenting the left ventricular myocardium from MBF pixel maps, validated on a retrospective dataset of 247 clinical CMR perfusion studies, each including rest and stress images of three slice locations, performed on a 1.5T scanner. Pixel-wise MBF maps were segmented using an automated pipeline including region growing, edge detection, principal component analysis, and active contours to segment the myocardium, detect key landmarks, and divide the myocardium into sectors appropriate for analysis. Automated segmentation results were compared against a manually defined reference standard using three quantitative metrics: Dice coefficient, Cohen Kappa and myocardial border distance. Sector-wise average MBF and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman Plots. The proposed method segmented stress and rest MBF maps of 243 studies automatically. Automated and manual myocardial segmentation had an average (± standard deviation) Dice coefficient of 0.86 ± 0.06, Cohen Kappa of 0.86 ± 0.06, and Euclidian distances of 1.47 ± 0.73 mm and 1.02 ± 0.51 mm for the epicardial and endocardial border, respectively. Automated and manual sector-wise MBF and MPR values correlated with Pearson's coefficient of 0.97 and 0.92, respectively, while Bland-Altman analysis showed bias of 0.01 and 0.07 ml/g/min. The validated method has been integrated with our fully automated MBF pixel mapping pipeline to aid quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion CMR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]