These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Approach in Children Presenting with Urinary Tract Infection: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Using RIVUR and CUTIE Data.
    Author: Scott Wang HH, Cahill D, Panagides J, Logvinenko T, Nelson C.
    Journal: J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1284-1290. PubMed ID: 34181468.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The initial imaging approach to children with urinary tract infection (UTI) is controversial. Along with renal/bladder ultrasound, some advocate voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG), ie a bottom-up approach, while others advocate dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan, ie a top-down approach. Comparison of these approaches is challenging. In the RIVUR/CUTIE trials, however, all subjects underwent both VCUG and DMSA scan. Our objective was to perform a comparative effectiveness analysis of the bottom-up vs top-down approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We simulated 1,000 hypothetical sets of 500 children using RIVUR/CUTIE data. In the top-down approach, patients underwent initial DMSA scan, and only those with renal scarring underwent VCUG. In the bottom-up approach, the initial study was VCUG. We assumed all children with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) received continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (CAP). Outcomes included recurrent UTI, number of VCUGs and CAP exposure. We assumed a 25% VUR prevalence in children with initial UTI with sensitivity analysis using 40% VUR prevalence. RESULTS: Median age of the original RIVUR/CUTIE cohort was 12 months. First DMSA scan was performed at a median of 8.2 weeks (IQR 5-11.8) after the index UTI. In the simulated cohort, slightly higher yet statistically significantly recurrent UTI was associated with the top-down compared with the bottom-up approach (24.4% vs 18.0%, p=0.045). On the other hand, the bottom-up approach resulted in more VCUG (100% vs 2.4%, p <0.001). Top-down resulted in fewer CAP-exposed patients (25% vs 0.4%, p <0.001) and lower overall CAP exposure (5 vs 162 days/person, p <0.001). Sensitivity analysis was performed with 40% VUR prevalence with similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The top-down approach was associated with slightly higher recurrent UTI. Compared to the bottom-up approach, it significantly reduced the need for VCUG and CAP.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]