These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Diagnostic performance of the physical activity-related question of the GINA questionnaire to detect exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. Author: Schiwe D, Heinzmann-Filho JP, Schindel CS, Gheller MF, Campos NE, Santos G, Donadio MVF, Pitrez PM. Journal: An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2021 Jul; 95(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 34225955. Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the item concerning physical activity of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) asthma control questionnaire for detection of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in children and adolescents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We divided participants (aged 6-18 years) with a diagnosis of asthma into two groups according to the GINA severity classification: mild/moderate asthma (MMA) and severe therapy-resistant asthma (STRA). We collected anthropometric, clinical and functional data (spirometry) and performed an EIB test. We used item 4 of the GINA questionnaire regarding exercise-induced symptoms to assess the diagnostic power of this instrument. RESULTS: We included 40 patients (17 with MMA and 23 with STRA) with a mean age of 11.3 years and a mean FEV1z-score of -0.33, of who 13 (32.5%) were classified as having uncontrolled asthma. Of the patients with uncontrolled asthma, 7 (53.8%) exhibited a decrease in the FEV1 after the EIB test. We found a higher frequency of EIB in participants with FEV1 z-score values of less than -1.0 compared to those with a z-score of -1.0 or greater (P = .05). There were no significant differences in the frequency of EIB based on disease severity and control. We also found no association of item 4 (GINA) with EIB. The area under the ROC curve demonstrated that the discriminative power of the GINA questionnaire for the detection of EIB is inadequate (P = .41), with sensitivity of 42.1% and specificity of 57.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The item concerning physical activity in the GINA questionnaire has insufficient diagnostic power to detect EIB in children and adolescents with asthma.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]