These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is the Dorsal Fiber-Splitting Approach to the Wrist Safe? A Kinematic Analysis and Introduction of the "Window" Approach.
    Author: Loisel F, Wessel LE, Morse KW, Victoria C, Meyers KN, Wolfe SW.
    Journal: J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Dec; 46(12):1079-1087. PubMed ID: 34325942.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the kinematic effects of the dorsal fiber-splitting approach for scapholunate ligament repair to a dorsal "window" approach that spares all ligaments. METHODS: We randomized 24 fresh-frozen paired cadaveric forearms to either the dorsal fiber-splitting capsulotomy approach (FSC) or the dorsal window approach (window) following scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) division. Loaded fluoroscopic radiographs were obtained after each of the 4 testing conditions following cyclic loading (200 cycles; 71 N): (1) intact SLIL, (2) SLIL-division, (3) surgical approach, and (4) closure. FSC specimens were randomly allocated to 2 subgroups for closure with either a suture anchor (n = 6) or a simple running suture closure (n = 6). Radiographic parameter measurements included the scapholunate gap, radiolunate angle, scapholunate angle, and dorsal scaphoid translation. RESULTS: Following the FSC, there were significant alterations in all radiographic parameters when compared with the intact and SLIL-division conditions. The window approach did not result in significant changes in any radiographic parameter. When compared to the window approach, all radiographic parameters of the FSC approach were significantly altered. Following closure with suture anchors in the FSC group, radiographic parameters improved, whereas with standard closure they failed to do so. Despite anchor closure, dorsal scaphoid translation, radiolunate angle, and scapholunate angle all remained elevated compared with scapholunate-divided wrists. CONCLUSIONS: The FSC produced significant changes in carpal posture under load, including scapholunate diastasis, dorsal intercalated segment instability, and dorsal scaphoid translation in SLIL-deficient wrists. The window approach preserved the critical dorsal ligament stabilizers and did not produce changes in carpal posture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The FSC may create iatrogenic changes in carpal posture that cannot be fully corrected with standard or anchor closure. The window approach does not alter carpal posture and should be considered when performing surgical procedures on the scaphoid or lunate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]