These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerance of Silver Sulfadiazine Dressings Once Daily Versus Twice Daily in the Treatment of Burn Wounds.
    Author: Lagziel T, Asif M, Born L, Quiroga LH, Duraes E, Slavin B, Shetty P, Caffrey J, Hultman CS.
    Journal: J Burn Care Res; 2021 Nov 24; 42(6):1136-1139. PubMed ID: 34363678.
    Abstract:
    Topical silver sulfadiazine (SSD) is an effective antimicrobial therapy used to prevent burn wound infection and promote healing, but the frequency of application has not been previously examined. This study compares once versus twice daily dressing changes with SSD, focusing on development of wound infections, incidence of hospital acquired complications, patient pain scores, and length of stay. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a once-daily or twice-daily application of SSD impacts burn wound healing outcomes. Our institution maintained a twice-daily dressing change standard of care until January 1, 2019. Patients admitted after that date had their dressing changed once daily. We performed a noninferiority analysis which indicated that a sample size of 75 per group would be sufficient to detect a significant difference with a power of 0.80. Our goal is to review outcomes for 75 patients before the change-of-practice and 75 patients after. Our main outcomes recorded are wound infection, average pain scores, average daily narcotic requirements, and length-of-stay. Results from 75 pre-change-of-practice and 75 post-change-of-practice patients showed slightly better outcomes in the post-change-of-practice group. The wound-infection rates were the same for both groups (pre = 5.33%, post = 5.33%), average daily pain levels for the pre-change group were slightly higher but the difference was negligible and not statistically significant (pre = 5.27, post = 5.25), hospital-related complication rates (unrelated to wound care) were higher pre-change (pre = 10.67%, post = 6.67%), and length-of-stay, was longer in the pre-change group (pre = 11.97, post = 10.31). The amount average amount of SSD (g/day) used per patient per hospital stay was higher as well (pre = 320.14, post = 202.12). Further statistical analysis of the results, particularly in the distribution of burn type, age, and burn depth showed no discrepancy and a generalized decreased length-of-stay with once-daily SSD dressing change. Our results show that once-daily dressing changes of SSD in burn wounds have no negative impact on wound outcomes. However, it is associated with a decreased length-of-stay, decreased pain levels, and less hospital-acquired complications. A decreased length-of-stay means reduced medical expenses for the patient and the hospital. In addition, less hospital-acquired complications result in better patient recovery. Since the difference in wound outcomes is negligible and statistically insignificant, changing the standard-of-care to once daily could prove beneficial.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]