These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical characteristics of a novel "Type 3" vasa previa: case series at a single center.
    Author: Kamijo K, Miyamoto T, Ando H, Tanaka Y, Kikuchi N, Shinagawa M, Yamada S, Asaka R, Fuseya C, Ohira S, Shiozawa T.
    Journal: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7730-7736. PubMed ID: 34372741.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Vasa previa is a condition in which fetal blood vessels are located on fetal membranes within 2 cm of the internal cervical os. Vasa previa has been classified into two types: Type 1, in which vessels connect a velamentous umbilical cord to the placenta, and Type 2, in which vessels connect the lobes of a bilobed placenta or the placenta to a succenturiate lobe. However, there are also atypical cases that cannot be classified into these two types. These cases are manifested by a center or marginal cord insertion with a normal shaped placenta, and fetal vessels were also located on membranes around the internal cervical os. These cases were recently proposed as Type 3 vasa previa. The present study investigated the incidence of Type 3 vasa previa and elucidated differences in clinical and ultrasonographical characteristics between traditional types and Type 3. METHODS: This was a single-center observational study using a cohort of all vasa previa cases between January 2010 and April 2020. RESULTS: Among 8,723 deliveries, there were 14 cases (0.16%) of vasa previa, all of which were diagnosed prenatally by US, not after vaginal delivery or CS. There were 9 (64%), 0, and 5 (36%) cases of Types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. All 5 Type 3 cases had only one fetal aberrant vessel of vasa previa, while 6 out of 9 Type 1 cases (67%) had two or more aberrant vessels. Seven Type 1 cases (78%) possessed two or more known risk factors, such as velamentous cord insertion, whereas all Type 3 cases only had one. Difficulties were associated with diagnosing two out of the 14 cases of vasa previa using routine transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). In these cases, the aberrant fetal vessel of vasa previa was only one vein with a thin wall that was not clearly visualized by gray-scale TVUS as well as slow flow that was easily misread by color-Doppler. These cases were ultimately diagnosed as vasa previa based on non-pulsatile flow detected by color and pulsed Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that Type 3 may account for a large proportion of vasa previa cases. Most Type 3 cases may present with only one fetal aberrant vessel of vasa previa and fewer risk factors, suggesting that the diagnosis of vasa previa may be more challenging in Type 3 cases than in the other types. Vasa previa with a venous vasa previa needs to be considered because of the difficulties associated with an antenatal diagnosis due to unclear imaging of the vasculature or the lack of specific color Doppler flow patterns. Pulsed Doppler imaging may be helpful for the diagnosis of these cases.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]