These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Prospective Evaluation of Tarsal Coalition Excision Show Significant Improvements in Pain and Function.
    Author: Mahan ST, Miller PE, Kasser JR, Spencer SA.
    Journal: J Pediatr Orthop; 2021 Oct 01; 41(9):e828-e832. PubMed ID: 34411051.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Excision of pediatric tarsal coalition has been successful in most patients. However, some patients have ongoing pain after coalition excision. This study prospectively assessed patient-based clinical outcomes before and after surgical excision of tarsal coalition, with particular emphasis on comparison to radiologic imaging. METHODS: We prospectively studied 55 patients who had symptomatic coalition excision for 2 years postoperatively. Patients filled out the modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, the University of California Los Angeles activity score, and the simple question "does foot pain limit your activity" at 4 different time points: preoperative, 6 months postoperative, 12 months postoperative, and 24 months postoperative. Comparisons were done utilizing patient demographics, imaging parameters, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with preoperative levels, patients showed improvements in all outcome parameters. Patients with calcaneonavicular coalitions showed initial rapid improvement with later slight decline, while patients with talocalcaneal coalitions showed more steady improvement; both were similar at 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrated remarkable clinical improvements after tarsal coalition excision regardless coalition type, though postoperative courses differed between calcaneonavicular and talocalcaneal types. Finally, a subset of patients has ongoing activity limiting foot pain after coalition excision which could not be explained by the data in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective cohort study.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]