These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The different sensitivities of aerosol optical properties to particle concentration, humidity, and hygroscopicity between the surface level and the upper boundary layer in Guangzhou, China.
    Author: Jin X, Li Z, Wu T, Wang Y, Cheng Y, Su T, Wei J, Ren R, Wu H, Li S, Zhang D, Cribb M.
    Journal: Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jan 10; 803():150010. PubMed ID: 34487897.
    Abstract:
    This study investigates the impact of aerosol liquid water content (ALWC) and related factors, i.e., relative humidity (RH), aerosol mass concentration (PM2.5), and aerosol hygroscopicity, on aerosol optical properties, based on field measurements made in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region of China at the surface (1 November 2019 to 21 January 2020) and in the upper boundary layer (the 532-m Guangzhou tower from 1 February to 21 March 2020). In general, temporal variations in the ambient aerosol backscattering coefficient (βp) and ALWC followed each other. However, the surface βp and 532-m βp had generally opposite diurnal variation patterns, caused by dramatic differences in PM2.5 and ambient RH between the surface and the upper boundary layer. The ambient 532-m RH was systematically higher than the surface RH, with the latter having a much pronounced diurnal cycle than the former. The surface PM2.5 concentration was systematically higher than the PM2.5 concentration at 532 m, and their diurnal cycle patterns were overall opposite. These dramatic differences reveal that the atmospheric variables, i.e., ambient RH and the PM2.5 concentration in the upper boundary layer, cannot be directly represented by the same variables at the surface. Vertical variability should be considered. Clear differences in the sensitivities of aerosol light scattering to ambient RH, PM2.5, and aerosol hygroscopicity between the two levels were found and examined. Aerosol chemical composition played a minor role in causing the differences between the two levels. In particular, βp was more sensitive to PM2.5 at the surface level but more to the ambient RH in the upper boundary layer. The larger contribution of aerosol loading to the variability in βp at the surface implies that local emission controls can decrease βp and further improve atmospheric visibility effectively at the surface during winter in the PRD region.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]