These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Effects and molecular mechanism of histone deacetylase 6 inhibitor Tubastatin A on the prolifera- tion and movement of human skin fibroblasts].
    Author: Zhang C, Zhang Q, Zhang JH, Wang F, Zhang JP.
    Journal: Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2021 Sep 20; 37(9):853-859. PubMed ID: 34645151.
    Abstract:
    Objective: To explore the effects and possible molecular mechanism of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibitor Tubastatin A on the proliferation and movement of human skin fibroblasts (HSFs). Methods: The experimental research method was used. HSFs in logarithmic growth phase were taken and divided into negative control group, 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group according to the random number table. The HSFs in negative control group were added with Dulbecco's modified eagle medium with the final volume fraction of 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (hereinafter referred to as the complete medium), and the other three groups were added with the complete medium with the corresponding final molarity of Tubastatin A. After 24 h of conventional culture, the cell proliferation activity was detected using cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) method and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) staining; the range of motion of cells within 3 h was observed under the living cell workstation, and the curve movement velocity of the cells was calculated. The protein expressions of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) were detected by Western blotting, and the ratio of p-ERK1/2 to ERK1/2 was calculated to represent the activity of ERK1/2. The sample number in cell proliferation activity detection with CCK-8 method was 6, while the sample numbers in other experiments were 3. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test. Results: After 24 h of culture, CCK-8 method and EdU staining showed that compared with negative control group, the cell proliferation activities in 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group were significantly decreased (P<0.01). After 24 h of culture, CCK-8 method showed that compared with 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, the cell proliferation activity in 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group was significantly decreased (P<0.05); EdU staining showed that compared with 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, the cell proliferation activities in 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group were significantly decreased (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Within 3 h of observation, the ranges of cell motion in 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group were obviously reduced compared with that in negative control group. Within 3 h of observation, the curve movement velocity of cells in negative control group was (0.780±0.028) μm/min, which was obviously faster than (0.594±0.023), (0.469±0.028), and (0.391±0.021) μm/min of 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group (P<0.01); the curve movement velocity of cells in 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group was obviously faster than those in 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group (P<0.01); the curve movement velocity of cells in 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group was obviously faster than that in 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group (P<0.05). After 24 h of culture, compared with negative control group, the activities of ERK1/2 of cells in 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group were decreased significantly (P<0.01); compared with 1 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, the activities of ERK1/2 of cells in 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group and 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group were decreased significantly (P<0.01); compared with 5 μmol/L Tubastatin A group, the activity of ERK1/2 of cells in 10 μmol/L Tubastatin A group was decreased significantly (P<0.05). Conclusions: HDAC6 inhibitor Tubastatin A may mediate the inhibitory effect on proliferation and movement of HSFs by inhibiting the activity of ERK1/2. 目的: 探讨组蛋白脱乙酰酶6(HDAC6)抑制剂Tubastatin A对人皮肤成纤维细胞(HSF)增殖及运动性的影响及其可能的分子机制。 方法: 采用实验研究方法。取对数生长期HSF,按随机数字表法分为阴性对照组及1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组。阴性对照组加入含终体积分数0.1%二甲基亚砜的DMEM培养液(以下简称完全培养液),其余3组分别加入含相应终物质的量浓度Tubastatin A的完全培养液。常规培养24 h后,采用细胞计数试剂盒8(CCK-8)法和5-乙炔基-2'-脱氧尿嘧啶核苷(EdU)染色检测细胞增殖活力;在活细胞工作站下观察细胞3 h内运动范围,计算细胞曲线运动速度;采用蛋白质印迹法检测胞外信号调节激酶1/2(ERK1/2)及磷酸化ERK1/2(p-ERK1/2)的蛋白表达量,并计算p-ERK1/2与ERK1/2比值,以此表示ERK1/2活性。CCK-8法行细胞增殖活力检测样本数为6,其余实验样本数为3。对数据行单因素方差分析及LSD检验。 结果: 培养24 h后,CCK-8法和EdU染色显示,与阴性对照组比较,1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞增殖活力均显著下降(P<0.01)。培养24 h后,CCK-8法显示,与1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组比较,10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞增殖活力显著下降(P<0.05);EdU染色显示,与1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组比较,5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞增殖活力显著下降(P<0.05或P<0.01)。观察3 h内,1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞运动范围较阴性对照组明显缩小。观察3 h内,阴性对照组细胞曲线运动速度为(0.780±0.028)μm/min,明显快于1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞的(0.594±0.023)、(0.469±0.028)、(0.391±0.021)μm/min(P<0.01);1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞曲线运动速度明显快于5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组和10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组(P<0.01);5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞曲线运动速度明显快于10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组(P<0.05)。培养24 h后,与阴性对照组比较,1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组、10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞ERK1/2的活性显著下降(P<0.01);与1 μmol/L Tubastatin A组比,5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组和10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞ERK1/2的活性显著下降(P<0.01);与5 μmol/L Tubastatin A组比较,10 μmol/L Tubastatin A组细胞ERK1/2的活性显著下降(P<0.05)。 结论: HDAC6抑制剂Tubastatin A可能通过抑制ERK1/2活性,从而抑制HSF增殖及运动。.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]