These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computed topography (CT) analysis of Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fracture revealed possible mechanisms of injury beyond varus deforming force.
    Author: Zhang Y, Wang R, Hu J, Qin X, Chen A, Li X.
    Journal: Injury; 2022 Feb; 53(2):683-690. PubMed ID: 34663508.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures (type IV TPFs) are known for complex fracture morphology and high frequency of knee subluxation. Varus deforming force has been believed to be the cause but which fails to explain the lateral tibial plateau comminution and the lateral femoral condyle bone edema observed on injury MRI. The purpose of this study is to further explore the mechanisms of injury of type IV TPFs by synthetically analysing the information obtained from MRI and CT of a cohort of patients. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2019, 49 type IV TPFs were surgically treated in our hospital. The patients with complete preoperative CT and MRI were enrolled. They were classified according to OTA/AO and Luo's updated three-column classification (uTCC) after fracture morphology analysing and measuring. Then the injuries of cruciate/collateral ligaments and bone contusion were studied on MRI. The discrepancy between obvious fracture and occult bone contusion/soft tissue disruption among the groups of uTCC were compared and analysed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were eligible for this study. Under uTCC system, all the cases were caused by varus force according to the tibial plateau angle and were classified into three groups of uTCC referring the posterior tibial slope angle: 4 were into hyperextension-varus, 21 into the extension-varus and 5 into the flexion-varus group. Fracture morphology analysis found in the extension-varus group, there were two distinct subgroups: OTA/AO 41B1.2 (medial+posteromedial columns disruption) and 41B3.3f (41B1.2 +posterolateral column disruption). Injury MRI revealed 28 of the 30 cases had more than 2 ligamentous injuries. The incidences of anterior and posterior cruciate injury were 96.7% and 43.3% respectively while 70% for medial collateral ligament (MCL). Eighteen out of 30 demonstrated apparent lateral femoral condyle bone contusion sign. Chi-square analysis found in the extension-varus group, the posterolateral column comminution was closely associated with lateral femoral condylar contusion (p<0.05) and MCL injuries (p<0.05). This finding and the absence of medial femoral condylar contusion was unlikely caused by uTCC proposed varus deforming force. CONCLUSION: In contrast to varus impaction, some type IV TPFs was probably caused by valgus or rotation force.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]