These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Total Hip Replacement Influences Spinopelvic Mobility: A Prospective Observational Study.
    Author: Haffer H, Wang Z, Hu Z, Hipfl C, Perka C, Pumberger M.
    Journal: J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):316-324.e2. PubMed ID: 34742872.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Abnormal spinopelvic mobility is identified as a contributing element of total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. Preoperative identification of THA patients at risk is still a remaining challenge. We therefore conducted this study to (1) evaluate if preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic mobility differs, (2) determine the interactions between the elements of the spinopelvic complex, and (3) identify preoperative parameters for predicting spinopelvic mobility. METHODS: A prospective observational study assessing 197 THA patients was conducted with biplanar stereoradiography in standing and relaxed sitting positions preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators determined spinopelvic mobility based on 2 different classifications (Δ sacral slope [SS] and Δ pelvic tilt [PT]; Δ from standing to sitting; Δ < 10° stiff, Δ ≥ 10°-30° normal, Δ > 30° hypermobile). Multiple regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to identify predictors for postoperative spinopelvic mobility. RESULTS: Spinopelvic mobility significantly increased after THA based on ΔPT (Pre/Post: 18.5°/22.8°; P < .000) and ΔSS (Pre/Post 17.9°/22.4°; P < .000). A distinct shift in the ratio from stiff (Pre/Post: 24%/9.7%) to hypermobile (Pre/Post: 10.2%/22.1%) mobility postoperatively was observed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis predicted postoperative stiffness using preoperative PTStanding ≥ 13.0° with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 51% and hypermobility with preoperative SSStanding ≥ 35.2° with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 34%. Age at surgery, preoperative PTStanding, and pelvic incidence were independent predictors of spinopelvic mobility (R2 = 0.24). CONCLUSION: Definition of preoperative stiffness should be interpreted with caution by arthroplasty surgeons as mobility itself is influenced by THA. For the first time thresholds for standing preoperative parameters for predicting postoperative spinopelvic mobility could be provided. For preoperative standing only lateral assessment could serve as a screening tool for spinopelvic mobility.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]