These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Partial STAT5 signaling is sufficient for CD4+ T cell priming but not memory formation.
    Author: Fleury M, Vazquez-Mateo C, Hernandez-Escalante J, Dooms H.
    Journal: Cytokine; 2022 Feb; 150():155770. PubMed ID: 34839177.
    Abstract:
    Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) plays an important role in regulating gene expression in response to cytokines of the common (γc) chain family. In this capacity, STAT5 promotes CD8+ effector and memory T cell survival and regulatory T cell development. However, its function in conventional CD4+ T cells is less clear. In this study, the requirement of intact STAT5 signaling for CD4+ effector and memory T cell generation and maintenance was investigated by using DO11.10 TCR transgenic T cells that are genetically deficient in STAT5A or B, as well as by transducing DO11 T cells with a dominant-negative STAT5 to temporally block STAT5 function. We found that the presence of STAT5A or B alone was sufficient for primary CD4+ effector T cell generation, but not for establishing a long-lived memory cell population. Similarly, blocking STAT5 signaling during priming did not prevent initial T cell activation, but inhibited the generation of memory cells. Surprisingly, blocking STAT5 post-priming did not impact the long-term survival of CD4+ memory T cells in vivo. Mechanistically, intact STAT5B, but not STAT5A, was required for IL-7Rα re-expression in activated T cells, which is an important cytokine receptor for CD4+ memory generation. These data show that fully functional STAT5 is essential to deliver an early, non-redundant signal for memory programming during the primary CD4+ T cell response, while partial STAT5 signaling is sufficient for effector differentiation. Our results have implications for the precise use of STAT5 inhibitors to timely inhibit memory T cell responses.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]