These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Feasibility of the 2-point method to determine the load-velocity relationship variables during the countermovement jump exercise.
    Author: Pérez-Castilla A, Ramirez-Campillo R, Fernandes JFT, García-Ramos A.
    Journal: J Sport Health Sci; 2023 Jul; 12(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 34852294.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of load-velocity (L-V) relationship variables obtained through the 2-point method using different load combinations and velocity variables. METHODS: Twenty men performed 2 identical sessions consisting of 2 countermovement jumps against 4 external loads (20 kg, 40 kg, 60 kg, and 80 kg) and a heavy squat against a load linked to a mean velocity (MV) of 0.55 m/s (load0.55). The L-V relationship variables (load-axis intercept (L0), velocity-axis intercept (v0), and area under the L-V relationship line (Aline)) were obtained using 3 velocity variables (MV, mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and peak velocity) by the multiple-point method including (20-40-60-80-load0.55) and excluding (20-40-60-80) the heavy squat, as well as from their respective 2-point methods (20-load0.55 and 20-80). RESULTS: The L-V relationship variables were obtained with an acceptable reliability (coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 7.30%; intra-class correlation coefficient ≥ 0.63). The reliability of L0 and v0 was comparable for both methods (CVratio (calculated as higher value/lower value): 1.11-1.12), but the multiple-point method provided Aline with a greater reliability (CVratio = 1.26). The use of a heavy squat provided the L-V relationship variables with a comparable or higher reliability than the use of a heavy countermovement jump load (CVratio: 1.06-1.19). The peak velocity provided the load-velocity relationship variables with the greatest reliability (CVratio: 1.15-1.86) followed by the MV (CVratio: 1.07-1.18), and finally the MPV. The 2-point methods only revealed an acceptable validity for the MV and MPV (effect size ≤ 0.19; Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient ≥ 0.96; Lin's concordance correlation coefficient ≥ 0.94). CONCLUSION: The 2-point method obtained from a heavy squat load and MV or MPV is a quick, safe, and reliable procedure to evaluate the lower-body maximal neuromuscular capacities through the L-V relationship.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]