These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A Comparative Study for Evaluating Passive Shielding of MRI Longitudinal Gradient Coil.
    Author: Alsharafi SS, Badawi AM, El-Sharkawy AM.
    Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():4444-4447. PubMed ID: 34892206.
    Abstract:
    Gradient coils are vital for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Their rapid switching generates eddy currents in the surrounding metallic structures of the MRI scanner causing undesirable thermal, acoustic, and field distortion effects. The use of actively shielded gradient coils does not eliminate such undesirable effects totally. Use of passive shielding was proposed lately to particularly help in mitigating eddy currents and loud acoustic noise. Numerical computations are necessary for calculating eddy currents and evaluating the efficacy of passive shielding. Harmonic and temporal eddy current analysis caused by gradient coil(s) using network analysis (NA) can be faster and more flexible than the traditional FDTD and FEM methods. NA was used more than a decade ago but was limited to analyzing eddy currents resulting from z-gradient coils of separated turns. NA with stream function was recently modified resulting in the more general Multilayer Integral Method (MIM) for simulation of eddy currents in thin structures of arbitrary geometries. In this work, we compared the performance of the NA method and an adapted MIM method to analyze eddy current in both the passive shielding and cryostat to the Ansys Maxwell 3D analysis thus evaluating the performance of gradient configurations with and without passive shielding. Both an unconnected and a connected z-gradient coil configuration were used. Our analysis showed high agreement in the profiles of eddy ohmic losses in metallic structures using the three methods. The NA method is the most computationally efficient however, it is limited to specific symmetries unlike the more general MIM and Ansys methods. Our implementation of the adapted MIM method showed computational efficiency relative to Ansys with comparable values. We have developed a computationally efficient eddy current analysis framework that can be used to evaluate more designs for passive shielding using different configurations of MRI gradient coils.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]