These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Diagnostic accuracy of vesical imaging-reporting and data system (VI-RADS) in suspected muscle invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
    Author: Jazayeri SB, Dehghanbanadaki H, Hosseini M, Taghipour P, Alam MU, Balaji KC, Bandyk M.
    Journal: Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 40(2):45-55. PubMed ID: 34895996.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) in detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched up to 8 March 2021 for the studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS for the detection of MIBC. Inclusion criteria were patients with bladder cancer; index test of VI-RADS based on multiparametric MRI; reference test of histopathological findings from TURBT, re-TURBT, or cystectomy and study design of cohort. Case reports, review articles, and editorials were eliminated, as well as studies with insufficient knowledge to acquire TP, FP, FN, and TN values of VI-RADS. The MIDAS module of STATA was for statistical analysis. The heterogeneity was explored using subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 22 eligible studies, consisting of 2,576 participants and 5,414 MRI reports, were included in this meta-analysis. The area under curve (AUC) of VI-RADS at cut-point values of 3 and 4 were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.91, 0.95), 0.93 (95%CI: 0.90, 0.95), respectively. Based on Youden's J statistic, the optimal VI-RADS cutoff value for predicting MIBC was determined as 3 which granted a pooled sensitivity of 89% (95%CI: 87%, 91%; I2=48%) and a specificity of 84% (95%CI: 80%, 87%; I2=90%). Based on meta-regression, the sources of inter-study heterogeneity for VI-RADS ≥ 3 were the sample size > 70, study design, single-center vs multi-center, patient population characteristics (i.e., gender, age), reference standard, histology, magnetic strength, T2WI slice thickness, and the number of radiologists reporting the MRI results (P value ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: The VI-RADS demonstrates consistently high diagnostic accuracy to predict MIBC. This scoring system could be applied in standard staging MRI reports of bladder cancer and can be incorporated into future MIBC work up guidelines.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]