These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cefamandole vs. procaine penicillin for treatment of pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae: a random trial.
    Author: Plaut ME, Perlino CA.
    Journal: J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S133-S138. PubMed ID: 349092.
    Abstract:
    The efficacy and safety of cefamandole nafate and penicillin G procaine suspension were compared in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in hospitalized adults. One hundred thirteen patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumococcal pneumonia were randomly assigned to receive 600,000 units of procaine penicillin intramuscularly every 12 hr or 500 mg of cefamandole intramuscularly every 6 hr. The two groups were comparable with regard to patient type and extent and severity of pneumonia. Alcohol abuse was a host factor in 31% of all patients in the trial. All strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated were inhibited by less than or equal to 1.6 microgram of cefamandole/ml. Of 58 patients treated with cefamandole, 50 had a satisfactory response, as did 46 of the 55 patients treated with penicillin. Results of tests of liver function were abnormal (primarily, elevated levels of transaminase or alkaline phosphatase) in 38% of the entire group of patients and occurred with equal frequency in patients receiving cefamandole or penicillin. Side effects during therapy, including superinfection, occurred equally with either drug. In a random trial, cefamandole was as effective and safe as penicillin in the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in adults.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]