These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Comparative Evaluation of Two NGAL Automated Immunoassays in Urine and Plasma. Author: Whitehead SJ, Chadwick K, Ford C, Giri R, Luckraz H, Gama R. Journal: J Appl Lab Med; 2022 May 04; 7(3):747-761. PubMed ID: 34993540. Abstract: BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI), a frequent and serious complication of hospitalized patients, is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a biomarker for the early identification of AKI. We report a comparative laboratory verification of the Abbott Diagnostics (ARCHITECT® urine NGAL) and BioPorto Diagnostics (NGAL TestTM) assays including an assessment of the Abbott assay's performance in EDTA plasma. METHODS: Intra-/interbatch imprecision, linearity, recovery, and limit of quantitation (LoQ) were assessed and an interassay comparison performed (n = 51). Between-laboratory agreement was assessed against other laboratories using the Abbott (n = 48) and BioPorto (n = 94) assays. Plasma NGAL (pNGAL) levels were measured in non-AKI patients with a range of estimated glomerular filtration rates (n = 80). RESULTS: Coefficients of variation (CVs) for intra- and interbatch imprecision were 0.7%-12.4% and 1.9%-27.5% for the BioPorto assay, respectively, and 1.4%-6.3%/3.4%-6.8%, respectively, for the Abbott assay. The BioPorto assay exhibited a higher LoQ (27.5 ng/mL vs 1.2 ng/mL). Both assays were linear over the range 5-6000 ng/mL. Recovery of recombinant NGAL was 113.1 ± 7.1% and 96.5 ± 7.8% for the Abbott and BioPorto assays, respectively. On average, the Abbott assay gave results 9.2% lower than the BioPorto assay. Mean differences of 0.2% (Abbott) and 20.2% (BioPorto) were observed in the between-laboratory comparison. In patients without AKI, pNGAL levels were inversely proportional to eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of the Abbott and BioPorto assays was similar although the latter performed less well at lower NGAL concentrations. The Abbott assay tended to yield lower results, exhibited a lower LoQ and over-recovered NGAL. Although only Conformité Européenne-marked and marketed for use in urine, the Abbott assay demonstrated equivalent performance to the BioPorto assay with EDTA plasma.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]