These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An Evaluation of Texture-Modified Diets Compliant with the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative in Aged-Care Facilities Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
    Author: Wu XS, Miles A, Braakhuis A.
    Journal: Dysphagia; 2022 Oct; 37(5):1314-1325. PubMed ID: 34993611.
    Abstract:
    Texture-modified diets (TMDs) are commonly prescribed for older adults with swallowing difficulties to improve swallowing safety. The International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) provides a framework for terminology, definitions and testing of TMDs. This observational mixed-method study used the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to establish the barriers and enablers to IDDSI adoption in aged-care facilities (ACFs). Five New Zealand ACFs who had adopted IDDSI > 12 months previously were recruited. Evaluation tools were developed based on CFIR constructs, integrating data from (i) mealtime observations; (ii) manager interviews and (iii) staff (nursing, carers and kitchen) self-administrated surveys. All facility and kitchen managers were IDDSI aware and had access to online resources. Three sites had changed to commercially compliant products post-IDDSI adoption, which had cost implications. Awareness of IDDSI amongst staff ranged from 5 to 79% and < 50% of staff surveyed felt sufficiently trained. Awareness was greater in large sites and where IDDSI was mandated by head office. Managers had not mandated auditing and they felt this had led to reduced perceived importance. Managers felt staff required more training and staff wanted more training, believing it would improve food safety and quality of care. Lack of a dedicated project leader and no speech pathologist on-site were perceived barriers. Collaboration between healthcare assistants, kitchen staff and allied health assisted implementation. ACF staff were aware of IDDSI but staff awareness was low. Using the CFIR, site specific and generic barriers and enablers were identified to improve future implementation effectiveness. Managers and staff want access to regular training. Multidisciplinary collaboration and improving communication are essential. ACFs should consider TMD auditing regularly. Successful implementation of IDDSI allows improvement of quality of care and patient safety but requires a systematic, site-specific implementation plan.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]