These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of five sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative patients with gastric cancer using the diagnostic criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2.
    Author: Lu JL, Xu Q, Zhu SQ, Chen L, Ding LY, Hua HX, Xu XY, Hu JM.
    Journal: Nutrition; 2022 Mar; 95():111553. PubMed ID: 34999385.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of five sarcopenia screening tools in preoperative patients with gastric cancer, including strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls; strength, assistance with walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, falls, and calf circumference (SARC-CalF); Ishii score chart; short version of the mini sarcopenia risk assessment; and full version of the mini sarcopenia risk assessment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of consecutive patients undergoing a gastrectomy between May 2020 and October 2020. Sarcopenia was diagnosed per the diagnostic criteria proposed by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2). Data on the five sarcopenia screening tools, patient characteristics, nutrition risk screening 2002, and diagnostic indicators of sarcopenia were collected preoperatively, and pathological characteristics of the tumor were collected postoperatively. Based on the EWGSOP2 criteria, the clinical validity of the sarcopenia tools was measured using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. A receiver operator characteristic curve and area under curve were applied to compare the overall screening accuracy, and a Youden index was calculated to determine the optimal cutoff value of each tool. RESULTS: We included 260 participants age 62.38 ± 11.21 y. Based on the EWGSOP2 criteria, the prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia were 8.46% and 4.62%, respectively. Moreover, the prevalence of sarcopenia risk ranged from 3.46% to 73.85% based on the five screening tools. Of these tools, SARC-CalF had the largest area under the curve (0.896) with moderate-to-high sensitivity (86.36%) and high specificity (92.86%). For SARC-CalF, the cutoff value of 10 reached the highest Youden index, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 81.82% and 93.44%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Among the above five screening tools, SARC-CalF appeared to be the optimal choice to screen sarcopenia in preoperative patients with gastric cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]