These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Value of propofol in microsurgery of the middle ear].
    Author: Lecomte D, Vulser C, Dassier P, Cousin MT.
    Journal: Cah Anesthesiol; 1987 Oct; 35(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 3500766.
    Abstract:
    In 21 anaesthetics on patients ASA I-II undergoing middle ear microsurgery, the induction was done by 2 mg/kg propofol and 2 mcg/kg fentanyl. Anaesthesia was maintained by a continuous infusion of propofol 100 mcg/kg/min and bolus injections of fentanyl 1 mcg/kg every 30 min, and controlled ventilation with 60% Nitrous Oxide. The side effects during induction and recovery were minor. After a slight fall in blood pressure at induction, the haemodynamic values were steady during the whole surgery. Haemostasis was always good: the operating field was bloodless in 13 patients (62%), relatively bloody in 8 (38%), but never inconvenient for the surgeon. While recovery happened later than in other studies, the time from eyes opening to complete consciousness was always short, less than 10 minutes. The adjunction of fentanyl could be responsible for the long recovery time. No correlation is found between the infusion rate of propofol and recovery time. All patients but one are satisfied with their anaesthesia, especially with their smooth recovery.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]