These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Coliform and Escherichia coli Contamination on External and Internal Surfaces of Beef Carcasses with and without Tissue Adhesion Excision.
    Author: Renter DG, Dodd CC, Noll LW, Nagaraja TG, Ives SE.
    Journal: J Food Prot; 2022 Apr 01; 85(4):701-705. PubMed ID: 35076692.
    Abstract:
    ABSTRACT: Following removal of hides and viscera during beef processing, carcasses are inspected for tissue adhesions that can affect meat quality or harbor bacteria. Carcasses with pleural or abdominal adhesions may be diverted from the production line for manual excision and then returned to the line. No published data indicate whether adhesion excision is associated with bacterial contamination. Therefore, our objective was to determine the presence and concentration of generic Escherichia coli and non-E. coli coliforms from the internal and external surfaces of carcasses that were, or were not, diverted for adhesion excision. During 9 processing days over a 4-month period in a large commercial beef processing facility, 1,738 carcass sponge samples from 2,730 cm2 areas on both the internal and the external surfaces of carcasses with and without tissue adhesions were collected. Coliforms and E. coli were cultured and enumerated using Petrifilm procedures, and data were analyzed with mixed models. Coliforms were present at higher concentrations than E. coli, and prevalence and mean log concentrations of both coliforms and E. coli were significantly higher for samples from the external than from the internal surfaces of carcasses. However, differences in prevalence and concentration of coliforms between external and internal surfaces varied significantly based on whether carcasses had adhesions excised. The difference was greatest for coliforms present on the external (2.06 log CFU/100 cm2) versus the internal (0.93 log CFU/100 cm2) carcass surfaces without adhesions, whereas the difference in concentrations from the external (1.80 log CFU/100 cm2) and the internal (1.31 log CFU/100 cm2) surfaces of carcasses with adhesions was not as large. These results indicate that surveillance of carcass bacteria may be affected by whether the external versus the internal surfaces are sampled and whether carcasses are diverted for excision of adhesions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]