These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An optimal extended-infusion dosing of cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients with continuous renal replacement therapy.
    Author: Sember AM, LoFaso ME, Lewis SJ.
    Journal: J Crit Care; 2022 Jun; 69():154011. PubMed ID: 35202996.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine optimal extended-infusion dosing regimens for cefepime and ceftazidime in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy using Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic models were built using published pharmacokinetic/demographic data to predict drug disposition in 5000 virtual critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) with the standard (20-30 mL/kg/h) and a higher (40 mL/kg/h) effluent rates. MCS was performed to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) of four cefepime and ceftazidime doses administered over 4-h with the target of ≥60% fT > 4×MIC. The lowest dose attaining PTA ≥90% during the first 48-h was considered optimal. Additionally, risk of drug toxicity was assessed at 48-h using suggested neurotoxicity thresholds. RESULTS: Cefepime 2 g loading dose (LD), then extended-infusion of 2 g q8hr was optimal in CVVH at 20 mL/kg/h and the same ceftazidime dose was optimal in CVVH at 20-30 mL/kg/h. Higher cefepime and ceftazidime doses were required to be optimal at higher effluent rates. This optimal dose particularly for cefepime likely increases neurotoxicity risk in most virtual patients with all CVVH settings. CONCLUSIONS: Cefepime and ceftazidime 2 g LD, followed by extended-infusion 2 g q8hr may be optimal in CVVH with standard effluent rates.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]