These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The validation of a low-cost inertial measurement unit system to quantify simple and complex upper-limb joint angles.
    Author: Goreham JA, MacLean KFE, Ladouceur M.
    Journal: J Biomech; 2022 Mar; 134():111000. PubMed ID: 35217243.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this research was to validate the use of a low-cost IMU system to measure upper-limb joint angles by comparing it to passive optical motion capture measures. Fifteen participants (five females; 25.9 ± 4.7 years) completed one trial of four simple range of motion (ROM) movements (elbow flexion/extension, shoulder abduction/adduction, shoulder flexion/extension, and shoulder internal/external rotation), and three complex functional daily tasks [hand to: back pocket (HBP), contralateral shoulder (HCS), head (HTH)]. Movements were measured, simultaneously, using fourteen OptiTrack cameras and five Notch® IMUs. The mean joint angle difference between devices ranged from 0.10° ± 3.11° for the HBP shoulder internal/external movement to 44.95° ± 3.50° for the simple ROM shoulder internal/external rotation movement. Nine of sixteen movement and plane comparisons showed significant differences between the device-specific movement cycle waveforms. Eleven of the comparisons showed either fixed and/or proportional biases (fixed only: 9; proportional only: 1; both fixed and proportional: 1). Due to multiple movements having large amplitude errors, low waveform similarities, and/or statistically significant mean differences between the Notch® IMUs and the gold-standard motion capture devices, we cannot recommend that Notch® IMUs are valid devices for measuring upper-limb joint angles during simple ROM and complex functional daily tasks.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]