These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Voiding cystourethrogram: Who gets a cyclic study and does it matter?
    Author: Arlen AM, Amin J, Leong T.
    Journal: J Pediatr Urol; 2022 Jun; 18(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 35241383.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) images the urethra and bladder during both bladder filling and emptying, as well as the ureters and kidneys when vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present. Given the variation in VCUG technique and reporting, the American Academy of Pediatrics Sections on Urology and Radiology published a joint standardized VCUG protocol in 2016, which included the recommendation of at least 2 voiding cycles to identify intermittent VUR and/or ureteral ectopia. STUDY DESIGN: VCUG were assessed for adherence to performance of cyclic study. Children who underwent cyclic evaluation were compared to those who underwent a single cycle VCUG. Radiation dosage was also analyzed. Studies performed on patients >18 years of age and those obtained as part of a trauma evaluation were excluded from study. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-four VCUGs were analyzed, 97 (34.2%) were positive for VUR on the initial cycle. Of the remaining 187 studies, 116 (62%) had multiple filling-voiding cycles while in 71 (38%) only a single cycle was performed. One hundred and sixty-one (86.1%) were negative for vesicoureteral reflux. Twenty-six (13.9%) children were diagnosed with VUR after the initial filling-voiding cycle: 6 were diagnosed with grade I, 2 grade II, 11 grade III, 2 grade IV and 5 grade V. Of the 123 total children found to have VUR, 26 (21.2%) were diagnosed after an initial negative cycle. Younger children were significantly more likely to have a cyclic study performed; mean age of patients undergoing a cyclic study was 1.09 ± 2.16 years versus 3.86 ± 4.5 years (p ≤ 0.0001). Categorically, 74.1% of children less than 1 year of age underwent a cyclic study compared to 6.9% of children older than 5 years of age (p ≤ 0.0001). There was no difference based on sex with 49.1% of males and 50.9% of females (p = 0.667) undergoing cyclic evaluation. Children undergoing a cyclic study had lower median radiation dose 2.15 microGy m2 (range 0.09-111) compared to 4.41 (range 1.3-104) [p = 0.01]. DISCUSSION: Vesicoureteral reflux may occur intermittently and cyclic VCUG is thought to enhance the ability to detect reflux. In our cohort, 26 children (9.2%) were only diagnosed after an additional cycle - ie 21.1% of reflux would have been missed had a cyclic study not been performed. The majority of these patients (69.2%, 18 of 26) were found to have dilating, and thus perhaps more clinically significant, reflux. Our study highlights the importance of obtaining as much information as possible and adhering to the standardized VCUG protocol. CONCLUSION: Younger children are more likely to undergo cyclic VCUG. While most reflux is detected with the initial filling-voiding cycle, 26 (21.2%) patients were diagnosed after an initial negative cycle with the majority being dilating VUR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]