These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Salivary duct carcinoma: A report of 70 FNA cases and review of the literature.
    Author: Wakely PE.
    Journal: Cancer Cytopathol; 2022 Aug; 130(8):595-608. PubMed ID: 35255198.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Although usually recognized as malignant, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) has been confused with other primary salivary gland (SG) neoplasms. This article undertook an analysis of a large collection of SDC FNA cases to assess diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and cytopathology. METHODS: Cytopathology files were searched for SDC with histopathologic validation. FNA biopsy smears were performed using standard techniques. RESULTS: Seventy cases from 56 patients (M:F, 1.9:1; age range, 26-92 years; mean age, 65 years) met inclusion criteria. All had tissue confirmation of SDC. FNA sites included: parotid gland (42, 60% cases), neck (10), submandibular gland (7), pre-/post-auricular area (5), face/cheek (3), mediastinal lymph nodes (2), and clavicle (1). Aspirates were from primary (52, 74%), metastatic (12, 17%), and locally recurrent (6, 9%) neoplasms. FNA diagnoses included: SDC (19, 27%), favor/suspicious for SDC (7, 10%), high-grade carcinoma (11), adenocarcinoma (9), carcinoma (6), malignant (6), SG neoplasm (5), atypia (3), SDC versus another malignancy (2), and pleomorphic adenoma (2). Large polygonal cells in groups and single forms showed cribriforming, variable necrosis, pseudopapillae, and oncocytic change. Androgen receptor staining was positive in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: FNA biopsy is accurate and reliable in classifying SDC as a malignant neoplasm, but much less so for identification as a specific tumor type. Using the Milan system, 86% of aspirates were classified as either malignant or suspicious for malignancy. A recurring pitfall includes sampling error in cases of SDC ex pleomorphic adenoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]