These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: An Intra-individual Comparison between Free-breathing Dynamic MR Imaging of the Liver Using Stack-of-stars Acquisition and the Breath-holding Method Using Cartesian Sampling or View-sharing.
    Author: Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Wakayama T, Morisaka H, Funayama S, Tamada D, Wang K, Mandava S, Cashen TA, Onishi H.
    Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci; 2023 Apr 01; 22(2):221-231. PubMed ID: 35296587.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the quality of dynamic imaging between stack-of-stars acquisition without breath-holding (DISCO-Star) and the breath-holding method (Cartesian LAVA and DISCO). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted between October 2019 and February 2020. Two radiologists performed visual assessments of respiratory motion or pulsation artifacts, streak artifacts, liver edge sharpness, and overall image quality using a 5-point scale for two datasets: Dataset 1 (n = 107), patients with Cartesian LAVA and DISCO-Star; Dataset 2 (n = 41), patients with DISCO and DISCO-Star at different time points. Diagnosable image quality was defined as ≥ 3 points in overall image quality. Whether the scan timing of the arterial phase (AP) was appropriate was evaluated, and results between the pulse sequences were compared. In cases of inappropriate scan timing in the DISCO-Star group, retrospective reconstruction with a high frame rate (80 phases, 3 s/phase) was added. RESULTS: The overall image quality of Cartesian LAVA was better than that of DISCO-Star in AP. However, noninferiority was shown in the ratio of diagnosable images between Cartesian LAVA and DISCO-Star in AP. There was no significant difference in the ratio of appropriate scan timing between DISCO-Star and Cartesian LAVA; however, the ratio of appropriate scan timing in DISCO-Star with high frame rate reconstruction was significantly higher than that in Cartesian LAVA in both readers. Overall image quality scores between DISCO and DISCO-Star were not significantly different in AP. There was no significant difference in the ratio of appropriate scan timing between DISCO-Star with high frame rate reconstruction and DISCO in both readers. CONCLUSION: The use of DISCO-Star with high frame rate reconstruction is a good solution to obtain appropriate AP scan timing compared with Cartesian LAVA. DISCO-Star showed equivalent image quality in all phases and in the ratio of appropriate AP scan timing compared with DISCO.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]