These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: First Validation of Myocardial Flow Reserve Derived from Dynamic 99mTc-Sestamibi CZT-SPECT Camera Compared with 13N-Ammonia PET.
    Author: Yamamoto A, Nagao M, Ando K, Nakao R, Matsuo Y, Sakai A, Momose M, Kaneko K, Hagiwara N, Sakai S.
    Journal: Int Heart J; 2022; 63(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 35354742.
    Abstract:
    13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (NH3-PET) can evaluate myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest, stress, and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) as well as the ratio of MBF at stress to that at rest. MFR is useful in predicting the prognoses of patients with various heart diseases. Cadmium-zinc-telluride single photon emission computed tomography (CZT-SPECT) enables us to acquire dynamic images of radiotracer kinetics and measure original MBF and MFR using 99mTc-sestamibi. This study aimed to investigate the utility of CZT-SPECT for quantitative assessment of MBF compared to NH3-PET. We validated the correlation of MBF and MFR between CZT-SPECT and NH3-PET. Fourteen patients using one-day rest/stress CZT-SPECT, D-SPECT followed by NH3-PET within 1 month were enrolled and analyzed prospectively. The reproducibility of the MBF and MFR obtained with these two methods was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plot analysis. The diagnostic value of D-SPECT for abnormal MFR defined using NH3-PET results as MFR < 2.0 was assessed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The median duration between D-SPECT and NH3-PET was 20 days. Although MBF was overestimated by D-SPECT compared to NH3-PET at high value (mean difference, 0.43 [0.34-0.53]), MBF and MFR were correlated with the two modalities (MBF: r = 0.71, P < 0.0001, MFR: r = 0.60, P < 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated a cutoff of 1.6 for detecting abnormal MFR with D-SPECT (sensitivity, 68%; specificity, 91%; AUC, 0.75). MBF and MFR obtained using D-SPECT and NH3-PET had a good correlation, suggesting that the quantitative MFR evaluation by CZT-SPECT may help understand the trend of NH3-PET MFR.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]