These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Genital footprints of extragenital tuberculosis in infertile women: Comparison of various diagnostic modalities.
    Author: Yadav S, Puri M, Agrawal S, Chopra K.
    Journal: Indian J Tuberc; 2022 Apr; 69(2):151-156. PubMed ID: 35379394.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Genital tuberculosis (TB) continues to remain an important cause of infertility in women, especially in developing countries. It is mostly consequent to a primary infection elsewhere in the body. The diagnosis is challenging, considering its paucibacillary nature. Although there are many studies on association of genital tuberculosis with infertility, there is paucity of literature on impact of extragenital tuberculosis on fertility of women through involvement of female reproductive organs. The various diagnostic modalities available have limitations and quest is ongoing for the best diagnostic test. METHOD: This was a prospective observational study conducted at the infertility clinic of a tertiary care health facility where 60 infertile women with either tubal factor or unexplained infertility with or without past history of extragenital tuberculosis were enrolled as study subjects or controls respectively. Mantoux test was performed in all women and diagnostic laparo-hysteroscopy was performed in all women to look for any evidence of uterine and/or tubal damage. The peritoneal fluid was sent for GeneXpert and Liquid culture for mycobacterium tuberculosis. Results of Mantoux test, GeneXpert and liquid culture were compared with the laparohysteroscopic findings. RESULT: Of the thirty infertile women in the study group, 27/30 (90%) had a history of pulmonary tuberculosis and 3/30 (10%) had history of tubercular cervical lymphadenopathy. It was observed that Mantoux test was positive (induration >10 mm) in 27/30 (90%) of women in the study group as compared to only 4/30 (13.3%) controls. Abnormal hysteroscopic findings were documented in 26.6% (8/30) study group women as compared to 6.6% (2/30) women in the control group. Similarly, 60% (18/30) of women in the study group had abnormal laparoscopic findings compared to 33% (10/30) in the control group. Seven out of thirty (23.3%) women were positive for GeneXpert in the study group compared to only 1/30 (3.3%) in the control group. Similarly, liquid culture was positive in 6/30 (20%) of women in the study group as compared to 1/30 (3.3%) in the control group. All the above differences were statistically significant. We observed that the sensitivity of Mantoux test (75.8%) stand alone was higher than the other tests combined (50%). However, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) increases markedly (up to 100%) to when all the three tests are combined. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that all women presenting with infertility should be screened for a past history of tuberculosis and actively worked up for genital tuberculosis in case the history is positive. The various available tests (Mantoux test, GeneXpert and liquid culture) have their limitations for the diagnosis of genital tuberculosis. Thus an approach of early resort to laparohysteroscopy in suspected patients is desirable so that definitive management may be instituted timely and promptly.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]