These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Deep learning-based image reconstruction of 40-keV virtual monoenergetic images of dual-energy CT for the assessment of hypoenhancing hepatic metastasis.
    Author: Lee T, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Joo I, Bae JS, Yoo J, Kim JH, Ahn C, Kim JH.
    Journal: Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6407-6417. PubMed ID: 35380228.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of deep learning model (DLM) reconstructed dual-energy CT (DECT) low-keV virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) for assessing hypoenhancing hepatic metastases. METHODS: This retrospective study included 131 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced DECT (80-kVp and 150-kVp with a tin filter) in the portal venous phase for hepatic metastasis surveillance. Linearly blended images simulating 100-kVp images (100-kVp), standard 40-keV VMI images (40-keV VMI), and post-processed 40-keV VMI using a vendor-agnostic DLM (i.e., DLM 40-keV VMI) were reconstructed. Lesion conspicuity and diagnostic acceptability were assessed by three independent reviewers and compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were also measured placing ROIs in metastatic lesions and liver parenchyma. The detection performance of hepatic metastases was assessed by using a jackknife alternative free-response ROC method. The consensus by two independent radiologists was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: DLM 40-keV VMI, compared to 40-keV VMI and 100-kVp, showed a higher lesion-to-liver CNR (8.25 ± 3.23 vs. 6.05 ± 2.38 vs. 5.99 ± 2.00), better lesion conspicuity (4.3 (4.0-4.7) vs. 3.7 (3.7-4.0) vs. 3.7 (3.3-4.0)), and better diagnostic acceptability (4.3 (4.0-4.3) vs. 3.0 (2.7-3.3) vs. 4.0 (4.0-4.3)) (p < 0.001 for all). For lesion detection (246 hepatic metastases in 68 patients), the figure of merit was significantly higher with DLM 40-keV VMI than with 40-keV VMI (0.852 vs. 0.822, p = 0.012), whereas no significant difference existed between DLM 40-keV VMI and 100-kVp (0.852 vs. 0.842, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: DLM 40-keV VMI provided better image quality and comparable diagnostic performance for detecting hypoenhancing hepatic metastases compared to linearly blended images. KEY POINTS: • DLM 40-keV VMI provides a superior image quality compared with 40-keV or 100-kVp for assessing hypoenhancing hepatic metastasis. • DLM 40-keV VMI has the highest CNR and lesion conspicuity score for hypoenhancing hepatic metastasis due to noise reduction and structural preservation. • DLM 40-keV VMI provides higher lesion detectability than standard 40-keV VMI (p = 0.012).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]