These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Efficacy of sustained-release verapamil: automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.
    Author: Zachariah PK, Sheps SG, Schriger A.
    Journal: J Clin Hypertens; 1986 Sep; 2(3 Suppl):133S-142S. PubMed ID: 3540223.
    Abstract:
    The potential antihypertensive effect of sustained-release (SR) verapamil was compared to immediate-release (IR) verapamil in a group of patients with essential hypertension. All patients were withdrawn from their previous antihypertensive medication(s) and were entered into an open-label IR verapamil study (dose varying from 80 to 120 mg TID). Patients were subsequently randomized in a double-blind fashion to continue the same dose of IR verapamil or an equivalent dose of SR verapamil. Automatic ambulatory blood pressure recordings were carried out with a Del Mar Avionics PIII Unit in eight patients who were randomized into the SR group. An initial 24-hour recording was performed on the IR verapamil group during the open-label phase and repeated following treatment with SR verapamil. Mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure (SPB) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 143 +/- 18 mmHg and 89 +/- 6 mmHg, respectively, on IR verapamil and 142 +/- 22 and 90 +/- 6 mmHg, respectively, on SR verapamil. There were no statistically significant differences noted between the two groups. Mean SBP and DBP varied similarly during waking and sleeping periods with IR and SR verapamil: With IR verapamil, SBP was 139 +/- 18 and 124 +/- 20 mmHg and DBP was 92 +/- 11 and 84 +/- 13 mmHg during waking and sleeping hours, respectively; with SR verapamil, SBP was 138 +/- 21 and 122 +/- 22 mmHg and DBP 92 +/- 10 and 80 +/- 10 mmHg during waking and sleeping hours, respectively. DBP was less than or equal to 90 mmHg in approximately 70% and 60% of patients in the IR verapamil and SR verapamil groups, respectively. Trough plasma levels of 92 +/- 44 and 67 +/- 32 ng/ml were measured by HPLC, 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, after treatment with IR verapamil. During a similar time interval, SR verapamil revealed plasma levels of 64 +/- 59 and 92 +/- 57 ng/ml, respectively. No correlation between change in DBP and plasma level of verapamil was demonstrated. No significant change in heart rate was observed during the 4-week period. In summary, verapamil is an effective antihypertensive medication and can be administered once a day as a slow-releasing preparation; it is most useful in patients in whom adrenergic blocking drugs are indicated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]