These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Life cycle assessment of biocemented sands using enzyme induced carbonate precipitation (EICP) for soil stabilization applications.
    Author: Alotaibi E, Arab MG, Abdallah M, Nassif N, Omar M.
    Journal: Sci Rep; 2022 Apr 11; 12(1):6032. PubMed ID: 35411057.
    Abstract:
    Integrating sustainability goals into the selection of suitable soil stabilization techniques is a global trend. Several bio-inspired and bio-mediated soil stabilization techniques have been recently investigated as sustainable alternatives for traditional techniques known for their high carbon footprint. Enzyme Induced Carbonate Precipitation (EICP) is an emerging bio-inspired soil stabilization technology that is based on the hydrolysis of urea to precipitate carbonates that cement sand particles. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was conducted to compare the use of traditional soil stabilization using Portland cement (PC) with bio-cementation via EICP over a range of environmental impacts. The LCA results revealed that EICP soil treatment has nearly 90% less abiotic depletion potential and 3% less global warming potential compared to PC in soil stabilization. In contrast, EICP in soil stabilization has higher acidification and eutrophication potentials compared to PC due to byproducts during the hydrolysis process. The sensitivity analysis of EICP emissions showed that reducing and controlling the EICP process emissions and using waste non-fate milk has resulted in significantly fewer impacts compared to the EICP baseline scenario. Moreover, a comparative analysis was conducted between EICP, PC, and Microbial Induced Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) to study the effect of treated soil compressive strength on the LCA findings. The analysis suggested that EICP is potentially a better environmental option, in terms of its carbon footprint, at lower compressive strength of the treated soils.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]